LAND OF
THE FREE
Mayhem erupts when a newly wealthy couple invites friends for a vegan feast to celebrate Independence Day.
Idea:
Political beliefs and their impact on relationships.
At the individual level, the film explores the tendency to prioritize political and religious ideologies over personal growth within our immediate circles. The protagonists seem to be building an identity solely on political or religious convictions which breeds division rather than fostering integrity. The narrative encourages introspection into the impact we can have locally.
Technological progress and its impact on our livelihood and freedom.
The film sheds light on the current advancements in technology and their impact on our lives, illustrating this through the dwindling middle class, growing social inequality, and unchecked corporate greed.
Politicization and social engineering.
On a political level, the narrative reflects on the damaging effects on family and friendship relashionships fueled by differing political beliefs. The film suggests that this divisive state of affairs benefits those in power who thrive on the age-old strategy of "divide and conquer."
"Land of the Free" is a thought-provoking dramedy that navigates the intricacies of personal growth, societal shifts, and political dynamics against the backdrop of a Fourth of July celebration.
CAST AND CREW
ISABEL - played by Diana Alvort
RADEK- played by Ziggy Baran
TOM - played by Anton Nassif
JANNET-Played by Melissa Miles
TAYLOR- Played by Yifen Low
BERRY- Played by Leah Procito
Diana is a highly accomplished multilingual actress and singer and songwriter, renowned for her exceptional performances in award-winning movies featured at prestigious festivals such as IFS Film Fest and the Madrid International Film Festival. She has performed in Theater, Film, TV shows, and Arenas such as The National Auditorium and World Trade Center in Mexico, Toronto Convention Center in Canada and in countless public and private shows all over USA and Mexico. She is also a producer of the film.
Story
Shortly after a heated presidential debate during which two candidates drop dead, a group of friends gathers to celebrate Independence Day.
Isabel and her spouse Tom throw a bash, splurging on it with Tom's recent tech breakthrough earnings. Thanks to his windfall, Tom invests in a lavish home. Among the guests are Tom's buddy Jannet and her partner Taylor, alongside cousin Radek and his new flame Berry. Everyone's dazzled by the grand house, but Jannet seems bitter because Tom's software caused Taylor to lose his job. They're greeted by an AI host named Mary.
Instead of the usual meat-filled BBQ, Tom goes for a vegan spread, sparking mixed reactions from the guests. As the night rolls on, fueled by wine and differing political opinions, tensions rise with intense debates.
The country's ideological rifts surface, with Jannet and Tom clashing, Taylor diving into conspiracy theories, and Isabel and Radek concealing a past affair. Arguments heat up further as secrets about shady business dealings and Tom's debts come out, leading to rifts among the friendships present.
Vegan dinner served full of cruelty.
Idea:
Political beliefs and their impact on relationships.
At the individual level, the film explores the tendency to prioritize political and religious ideologies over personal growth within our immediate circles. The protagonists seem to be building an identity solely on political or religious convictions which breeds division rather than fostering integrity. The narrative encourages introspection into the impact we can have locally.
Technological progress and its impact on our livelihood and freedom.
The film sheds light on the current advancements in technology and their impact on our lives, illustrating this through the dwindling middle class, growing social inequality, and unchecked corporate greed.
Politicization and social engineering.
On a political level, the narrative reflects on the damaging effects on family and friendship relashionships fueled by differing political beliefs. The film suggests that this divisive state of affairs benefits those in power who thrive on the age-old strategy of "divide and conquer."